Mumbai Man Harassed for Having Phone Number Almost Similar to Rhea Chakraborty’s
An uncanny resemblance in telephone quantity with actress Rhea Chakraborty has ended in a Mumbai guy going through abuse over requires every week now, a Mumbai Mirror record has claimed.
After receiving a barrage of abusive calls, 32-year-old Sagar Surve, who works at an academic establishment, has blocked with regards to 150 other folks on his telephone or even switched off his software. The record says that Sagar and Rhea’s telephone numbers are simply other in a single digit and this has ended in a case of incorrect id.
Rhea’s quantity was once flashed by means of a information channel whilst revealing her calls main points in reference to Sushant Singh Rajput demise case. Sagar’s quantity and Rhea’s differed by means of only one digit and ended in confusion and later harassment over calls and messages.
About being abused by means of unknown callers, Sagar mentioned, “I began receiving messages, voice calls and video calls on WhatsApp. Other folks requested me to ship them of myself after I advised them that they had been incorrect. I attempted to forget about the calls nevertheless it simplest worsened over the following 3 days.”
Sagar in the end needed to block with regards to 150 callers or even switched off his telephone. Now, Sagar is considering converting his quantity.
Rhea has been named as top accused in an FIR filed by means of overdue Bollywood actor Sushant Singh Rajput’s father. The subject is now within the court docket and Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has taken over the case. Investigation is underway after the Dil Bechara actor was once discovered useless in his Bandra condo on June 14.
Array
(
[videos] => Array
(
)
[query] => https://pubstack.nw18.com/pubsync/v1/api/movies/advisable?supply=n18english&channels=5d95e6c378c2f2492e2148a2,5d95e6c278c2f2492e214884,5d96f74de3f5f312274ca307&classes=5d95e6d7340a9e4981b2e10a&question=actorp.c2Cblack+magicp.c2Cbollywoodp.c2Ccbip.c2CKK+Singh&publish_min=2020-08-09T12:59:51.000Z&publish_max=2020-08-12T12:59:51.000Z&sort_by=date-relevance&order_by=zero&prohibit=2
)
