Delhi Cop Will get One-Day Imprisonment For Contempt Of Court docket

New Delhi:

The Delhi Top Court docket has sentenced a police officer to prison for an afternoon for contempt of courtroom after he arrested an individual in breach of the instructions of the Splendid Court docket.

Justice Najmi Waziri refused to simply accept the apology tendered via the Delhi Police officer within the contempt complaints and said that non-public liberty will also be curtailed best via a process established via regulation.

The Top Court docket additionally fined the police officer Rs 2,000 and imposed a nominal value of Rs 15,000 for those complaints on him, to be paid to the petitioner who suffered incarceration for 11 days.

“Preserving in thoughts that R-Three is a serving police officer with the Delhi Police, that he has served for seven years and will have a protracted profession forward of him, he’s sentenced to easy imprisonment for someday at the side of a advantageous of Rs 2,000 in addition to nominal prices of Rs 15,000 for those complaints, to be paid via him to the petitioner inside 4 weeks,” the courtroom stated in its order handed in December.

Justice Waziri clarified that the order could be stored in abeyance for 2 months from its receipt with a purpose to accord enough alternative to the officer assail it if he so desired.

The Top Court docket famous the petitioner used to be arrested on allegations of legal breach of accept as true with, entailing a most sentence of 3 years, with out the necessary issuance of a understand of look below phase 41A of Prison Process Code in relation to the Splendid Court docket’s instructions in Arnesh Kumar case.

Justice Waziri stated the “highhandedness of the police officer” in particular breach of the Splendid Court docket’s instructions used to be “obvious” and the arrest of the petitioner used to be now not warranted within the approach through which it used to be performed.

The police officer used to be deemed to have due wisdom of the rights of a citizen and the process prescribed in regulation, the courtroom said.

It seen that the petitioner and his circle of relatives suffered humiliation and the indignity of being arrested and “no quantity of rationalization to the neighbours or those that will have observed the arrest would undo the embarrassment”.

It added that arrest destroys an individual and any next unencumber or acquittal of an blameless is of no solace to the lack of popularity or for the transient lack of valuable private liberty.

(Aside from for the headline, this tale has now not been edited via TTN body of workers and is printed from a syndicated feed.)