Allegations of unlawful sand mining in Mahendragarh: HC seeks record from sdditional civil pass judgement on in four days
| Chandigarh |
November 13, 2020 3:57:50 am
The petitioner, Shiv Lal, thru his suggest, suggest Mukesh Yadav, had contended sooner than the HC that unlawful mining of adlescent minerals specifically sand is happening in Mahendergarh by the hands of Rakesh Kumar, sarpanch of Karira gram panchayat.
THE PUNJAB and Haryana Top Court docket has sought a record at the allegations of unlawful sand mining by means of the sarpanch of Karira gram panchayat in Mahendergarh district, from Further Civil Pass judgement on (Senior Department), Kanina, inside 4 days.
The bench of Justices S N Satyanarayana and Archana Puri, within the order handed on Thursday mentioned, “As quickly because the record comes, we will be able to glance into the similar and would cross suitable orders to make sure that actually elicited from the aforesaid workout.”
The bench additional mentioned that whether it is discovered that the allegations and accusations made by means of the petitioner are true, suitable instructions can be issued to the involved government. The bench additionally mentioned that in the event that they discovered that the director of Mines and Geology, director of Building and Panchayats Division, Haryana and Mahendergarh deputy commissioner had been supporting the sarpanch, it “would possibly not additionally hesitate to begin complaints towards the 3 officers in addition to Further Leader Secretary, Haryana, House Division for giving improper data to this courtroom”.
The petitioner, Shiv Lal, thru his suggest, suggest Mukesh Yadav, had contended sooner than the HC that unlawful mining of adlescent minerals specifically sand is happening in Mahendergarh by the hands of Rakesh Kumar, sarpanch of Karira gram panchayat. Recommend Yadav submitted that although the unlawful mining has been dropped at the awareness of the 3 executive officers of the district and different so-called accountable officials of the State, however they have got slept over the subject. Listening to the plea, the HC bench thus sought replies from officers involved within the subject, by means of the best way of submitting affidavits.
The bench after listening to the events mentioned, “we realize that there’s an try at the a part of respondents no.3 (director, construction & panchayats division) and four (deputy commissioner, Mahendergarh) in addition to Addl. Leader Secretary for the State in looking to give other color to all the transaction as though there is not any unlawful mining of sand is happening, to the contrary, the sarpanch has unauthorisedly got rid of earth from the village land…Even though such an try is made, the paperwork which can be produced by means of them would obviously point out that there’s an try on their phase to misinform this courtroom, in up to the phrase sand is utilized in many puts. Actually, discovered state suggest additionally attempted to persuade us that within the criticism which is given in vernacular language, the phrase used is mitti (earth) and now not sand”.
Adjourning the subject for November 19, the courtroom requested Prateek Jain, Further Civil Pass judgement on (Senior Department), Kanina, to consult with where along side petitioner Shiv Lal, and in addition along side Ranbir Singh, SDM, Kanina, if he’s to be had and to publish his report back to this courtroom inside 4 days.
© The Indian information (P) Ltd
